An alternative perspective about taking meeting minutes

people-coffee-tea-meeting.jpg

I was talking to a recruiter once who asked me how I felt about taking meeting minutes. The first thing I said was “I think meeting minutes are overrated because I’ve rarely if ever seen them consulted again by meeting participants. When is the last time you consulted meeting minutes after a meeting was over?” While we both laughed about my response, I was quite serious and didn’t know how serious I was myself until well after the call was over.

I’ve heard all the shtick about the value of meeting minutes while attending meetings in commercial and federal government organizations. I know that it is an ITIL requirement. Yet, in practice, they take up hard drive space. They also serve as a check mark on some auditor’s checklist who wasn’t at the meeting anyway and who may or may not even understand the project or its underlying technologies.
Meeting attendance and note taking are also personal things in my experience. Everybody including the project managers comes into a meeting with their own agendas whether they are written down or not. For example, when I come to a meeting, I am there to represent technical documentation.
When the meeting organizer – typically a project manager or other management type – parcels out the role of taking meeting minutes (typically to the technical writer) they are actually doing a disservice for a number of reasons.
First, meeting management can be a dark art in some organizations. That means lucky schmuck who gets stuck taking notes has to follow the bouncing ball of a meeting agenda that goes offsides more than it stays on target. Such meetings can steal from the attention of the note taker making them even less of a contributor than if they were taking notes that mattered to their segment of the project. Second, wishy-washy management and communications styles don’t translate well in meeting minutes.
The ideal note taker for meeting minutes is and will always be the meeting organizer and not one of the participants because they should be the arbiter of what agenda items are important and when a decision about a project action item or issue is final. Meeting attendees need to be there to represent their areas not record the meeting for the sake of bureaucracy.
But, I will say that there are other project artifacts like status reports are much better indicators of the progress (or lack thereof) on a project or task. The status report is written with much attention to what is taking place on the project.
The aged and dogged concept of meeting minutes should also feel the crosshairs from technology changes. Note taking using applications such as Evernote and Microsoft OneNote mean that meeting attendees can open up their own meeting notes to other attendees for reading and collaboration. It takes standardizing a team on one of these applications. The growing use of web conferencing platforms also means that you can make recordings available to people after the meeting
Meeting minutes are a relic of days gone by. and especially in today’s day and age where self-directed note taking and collaborative technologies can capture a complete picture of a meeting.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s